Today’s Popular Posts
- .
Popular Posts
- ,
Posts in this Impact Area: (Neuroscience)
- Getting your head around huge brain projects
- Glia brain cells: Not just infrastructure
- Rethink the brain: More evidence for the tripartite synapse
- Adenosine: A blood-brain barrier beachhead
- A keystone discovery: Proteins and synaptic vesicles
- Neuroscience: Memory tied to a specific protein complex
- Connecting to neurons with semiconductor nanotubes
- The visual cortex can learn to do speech and language
- Ephaptic coupling: Could be how brains coordinate
- Optogenetics: Controlling live neurons with light
- Wearable robotics: Adding proprioception
- Neuroscience: The brain’s got rhythm
- Man and worm: A cortex in common
- DHA: The alpha of omega-3
- Enhancer RNA (eRNA): More powerful than previously thought
- Cracking the neural code: Not yet, but models help
- New link between proteins and memory
- Psychopaths love them some dopamine
- The animal brain replays memories to map its environment
- Reading the brain for motor control – without implants
- Brain memory is actively cleared
- New links in neuron impulse generation
- Update: fMRI reveals conscious activity in vegetative brains
- It’s not a ‘stream’ of consciousness…
- fMRI reveals conscious activity in vegetative brains
- A coordinate system in the brain
- Remembering faces, a specialized memory
- Update: IBM Cortical Simulator
- Two (neuro)memory bits
- Learning over time better than cramming
- Give memory a rest

Remembering faces, a specialized memory
It’s a familiar pattern in science, the more we learn about something, the more variations we see in the details. Take, for example, the human brain and its memory capacity. “Memory” used to be considered a unitary capability, that is, the ability to remember things was thought to be all part of the brain’s area that holds memory. Then it was learned that many different parts of the brain contribute to memory. Likewise, the thinking was that various memory skills, such as languages and image retention, were functions of a generalized memory capability. New research, conducted at Beijing Normal University (China), is now showing that at least in some areas, memory skills are specialized.
The question in the Beijing study was whether the ability to retain images of people’s faces was a matter of heredity – and a function of IQ – or something else. Retaining images of human faces is a ‘survival skill,’ meaning that our capacity to analyze and remember faces is part of our ability to discern danger or threat. (There are, of course, positive aspects as well, such as the ability to detect visual signs of love or friendship, which come to think of it is part of survival too.)
Using 102 pairs of identical twins (sharing 100% of their genome) and 71 pairs of fraternal twins (sharing 50% of the genome), both groups were shown 20 different facial images. Thereafter, they were shown 20 images and scored on their ability to remember if they had seen any of them before. 37% of the identical twins identified exactly the same score, whereas only 5% of the fraternal twins matched scores. This was an indication that facial recognition has a hereditary component. Similar tests were done with facial images that were upside down or offset in odd ways; this resulted in similar scores for both groups and showed that general image retention is different than memory of faces.
To examine the relationship of facial image retention to IQ, all the twins were given a standardized IQ test (Raven’s Matrices). It turned out twins that shared the ability to remember facial images did not share IQ scores. This confirmed facial recognition as a skill separate from other cognitive skills that make up IQ.
The implication of the study was that besides a generalized memory function, we have evolved other specialized memory skills – some of which are hereditary.