New study: Males not at the end of genetic line

Sex, like vitamins, has no end of contradictory research findings. Not so long ago (two months?) it was common belief among scientists (if not among the female population) that males – in particular the Y chromosome – were degrading (evolutionarily speaking). Evidence seemed to show that the mammalian Y-chromosome is slowly deteriorating, or at least stagnant. You might remember headlines like, “Are Males Necessary?” (Such headlines seem to show up every now and again.) Now, a new study conducted by the Whitehead Institute (Massachusetts, USA) has reached a different conclusion: The Y-chromosome is quite active indeed, not degrading or static at all, thank you.

The basis of the study is a first-of-its-kind direct comparison between the Y-chromosomes of chimpanzees and human beings. There was a surprise. It was expected that the chimp Y-chromosome (arduously decoded for this study by the Genome Center at Washington University) would be almost identical to that of the human Y-chromosome. It’s not. The human Y-chromosome has 30-50% more genes than the chimp. Assuming that chimps and human started with the same genome, this change or ‘loss’ of genes on the part of chimps indicates that in a relatively short time (evolutionary time) the Y-chromosome has been quite dynamic.

Why has the chimp chromosome changed? We don’t know. The study speculates:

“People are living in the house, but there’s always some room that’s being demolished and reconstructed,” says Page, who is also a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator. “And this is not the norm for the genome as a whole.”

Wes Warren, Assistant Director of the Washington University Genome Center, agrees. “This work clearly shows that the Y is pretty ingenious at using different tools than the rest of the genome to maintain diversity of genes,” he says. “These findings demonstrate that our knowledge of the Y chromosome is still advancing.”

Hughes and Page theorize that the divergent evolution of the chimp and human Y chromosomes may be due to several factors, including traits specific to Y chromosomes and differences in mating behaviors.

Because multiple male chimpanzees may mate with a single female in rapid succession, the males’ sperm wind up in heated reproductive competition. If a given male produces more sperm, that male would theoretically be more likely to impregnate the female, thereby passing on his superior sperm production genes, some of which may be residing on the Y chromosome, to the next generation.

[Source: EurekAlert]

This is to say that sexual practices may, eventually, have some impact on sex chromosomes. The Y-chromosome, at least for chimps, is evolving even faster than the rest of its genome – static it’s not. This may also be true for humans, although it would be very hard to characterize anything in the range of homo sapiens sex practices as genetically advantageous.

Research Spectrum

Share
This entry was posted in News and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Posts in this Impact Area: (DNA Decoding)

  • Gene expression and regulation: It’s the location, baby.
  • Fetal DNA sequencing: Reading ma and pa’s genome
  • Bonobo Genome: Our ever-lovin’ kin get closer
  • microDNA: A new piece of genetics puzzle
  • Personal genome disease risk analysis: New study finds important limits
  • Human genetics: The mysterious unequal mutation by sex
  • Oh Daphnia, why so many genes?
  • Hoogsteen base pairs: An alternate structure in DNA
  • The shape of the genome influences genetics
  • DNA redundancy: Genetic sequence copies are more prevalent and important than thought
  • Histones: DNA packaging and much more
  • A form of muscular dystrophy depends on ‘junk’ DNA
  • Transposons and the dynamic genome
  • microRNA: A cellular communicator
  • Update: Research on ‘old-age genes’ challenged
  • The Human Genome Project: Ten years later
  • Fascinating: Many of us have genes from Neanderthals
  • The growing GWAS controversy
  • Genetic pause control
  • A new layer of genetic information: DNA sub-code
  • The pitfalls of ‘informed consent’ for DNA analysis
  • Surprise verdict in U.S. gene patent case
  • Fingered by hand bacteria
  • Clinical genetics: Two cases
  • New study: Metagenomics gets a gut feel
  • Small RNA: New pathways for gene regulation?
  • Follow-up: Another ‘junk DNA’ study
  • More ‘junk DNA’ that actually does something
  • Waking the dead
  • New study and research tool: DNA mutations and molecular effects
  • Common diseases: Rare gene mutations are important
  • Update: Males not at the end of genetic line
  • New study: Males not at the end of genetic line
  • Heart disease linked to epigenetics
  • In the helix grooves – how proteins find the DNA
  • Biological clocks: RNA keeps time
  • Corn (maize) genome sequenced
  • Important bacteria protein-DNA link discovered
  • DNA Barcoding and the supermarket of genetic identification
  • Evolution seen through 10K vertebrate genomes
  • Beyond the genome: Mapping the epigenome
  • Mapping human genome variations
  • Post a Comment

    Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

    *
    *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    *