Today’s Popular Posts
- .
Popular Posts
- ,
-
RSS - Subscribe to SciTechStory
- .
-
Log In
SciTech Birth Day: May 23
SciTech Impact Areas
01. Climate Change
02. Alternative Energy
03. Computer Power
04. Nanotechnology
05. Stem Cells
06. Communications
07. Hydrocarbon Use
08. Clean Transportation
09. Online Information
10. DNA Decoding
11. Cell Biology
12. Photonics
13. Proteomics
14. Quantum Physics
15. Genetic Modification
16. Degrading Oceans
17. Robotics
18. Nanomedicine
19. Neuroscience
20. Extending Lifespan
21. Overpopulation
22. Scientific Instruments
23. Synthetic Biology
24. Nuclear Physics
25. Artificial Intelligence
26. Body Implants
27. Major Disease Cures
28. Water Shortage
29. Species Loss
30. Brain Enhancement
31. Origin of Life
32. Sensor Technology
33. Pandemics
34. Exogenous Life
35. Dark Matters
36. Cosmology
37. Energy Storage
38. Virtual/Augmented Reality
39. Space Exploration
40. Impact Event
02. Alternative Energy
03. Computer Power
04. Nanotechnology
05. Stem Cells
06. Communications
07. Hydrocarbon Use
08. Clean Transportation
09. Online Information
10. DNA Decoding
11. Cell Biology
12. Photonics
13. Proteomics
14. Quantum Physics
15. Genetic Modification
16. Degrading Oceans
17. Robotics
18. Nanomedicine
19. Neuroscience
20. Extending Lifespan
21. Overpopulation
22. Scientific Instruments
23. Synthetic Biology
24. Nuclear Physics
25. Artificial Intelligence
26. Body Implants
27. Major Disease Cures
28. Water Shortage
29. Species Loss
30. Brain Enhancement
31. Origin of Life
32. Sensor Technology
33. Pandemics
34. Exogenous Life
35. Dark Matters
36. Cosmology
37. Energy Storage
38. Virtual/Augmented Reality
39. Space Exploration
40. Impact Event
Impact Areas listed in order of ranking

Research paper subtext
It has long been known that…
(I didn’t have time to look it up.)
It seems of great practical and theoretical importance…
(Could be kinda interesting)
While it was not possible to answer…
(The experiment failed.)
The XYZ system was chosen as especially suitable…
(The guy in the next lab already had the setup.)
Three of the samples were chosen for study…
(We had no idea what the other ones were.)
The machine’s calibrations were uniformly excellent.
(as per the manufacturer’s sales pitch)
Standard safety measures were enforced…
(The hood fan was always on.)
Samples were handled with extreme care…
(Except the ones dropped on the floor.)
Typical results are shown…
(Our best results were…)
This chart is complex…
(The chart is unreadable, but looks impressive.)
The agreement with the predicted curve is excellent…
(After we dropped half the data.)
The results were good.
(poor)
The results were satisfactory.
(doubtful)
The results were fair.
(imaginary)
The results were as good as could be expected.
(non-existent)
The results were correct within an order of magnitude.
(not even in the ballpark)
Additional work will be required to achieve a complete understanding.
(I didn’t understand what this was, at all.)
Hopefully this will stimulate further work in the field.
(This paper’s a crock, but maybe somebody will get it right.)
Thanks to Joe Smith for his assistance in the lab,
and to John Doe for the helpful discussions.
(Joe Smith did the experiments.
John Doe explained what they meant.)