-
RSS - Subscribe to SciTechStory
- .
Log In
-
SciTech Birth Day: February 6
SciTech Impact Areas
01. Climate Change
02. Alternative Energy
03. Computer Power
04. Nanotechnology
05. Stem Cells
06. Communications
07. Hydrocarbon Use
08. Clean Transportation
09. Online Information
10. DNA Decoding
11. Cell Biology
12. Photonics
13. Proteomics
14. Quantum Physics
15. Genetic Modification
16. Degrading Oceans
17. Robotics
18. Nanomedicine
19. Neuroscience
20. Extending Lifespan
21. Overpopulation
22. Scientific Instruments
23. Synthetic Biology
24. Nuclear Physics
25. Artificial Intelligence
26. Body Implants
27. Major Disease Cures
28. Water Shortage
29. Species Loss
30. Brain Enhancement
31. Origin of Life
32. Sensor Technology
33. Pandemics
34. Exogenous Life
35. Dark Matters
36. Cosmology
37. Energy Storage
38. Virtual/Augmented Reality
39. Space Exploration
40. Impact Event
02. Alternative Energy
03. Computer Power
04. Nanotechnology
05. Stem Cells
06. Communications
07. Hydrocarbon Use
08. Clean Transportation
09. Online Information
10. DNA Decoding
11. Cell Biology
12. Photonics
13. Proteomics
14. Quantum Physics
15. Genetic Modification
16. Degrading Oceans
17. Robotics
18. Nanomedicine
19. Neuroscience
20. Extending Lifespan
21. Overpopulation
22. Scientific Instruments
23. Synthetic Biology
24. Nuclear Physics
25. Artificial Intelligence
26. Body Implants
27. Major Disease Cures
28. Water Shortage
29. Species Loss
30. Brain Enhancement
31. Origin of Life
32. Sensor Technology
33. Pandemics
34. Exogenous Life
35. Dark Matters
36. Cosmology
37. Energy Storage
38. Virtual/Augmented Reality
39. Space Exploration
40. Impact Event
Impact Areas listed in order of ranking

Waking the dead
Waking the dead. This was the actual title of a press release from the University of Copenhagen (Denmark). What will the media of scientific weirdness make of this (not to mention the tabloids)? They’d make nothing of it; if they actually read the release. “Waking the dead” is a fanciful notion, something like a poet might use (while hung-over), to apply to the real story of reconstructing the genome of a man who died 4,000 years ago.
What actually happened was that researchers Professor Eske Willerslev and his PhD student Morten Rasmussen, from the Centre of Excellence in GeoGenetics at the Natural History Museum, University of Copenhagen, in collaboration with genetic specialists in many parts of the world and especially China, were able to find a lock of hair, the only remains from an inhabitant of Greenland of some 4,000 years ago. They used the hair to reconstruct the genome. As modern genetic sequencing improves, the price and time required for running a complete genome has come way down in recent years. This one only took a few months and two private grants. The hard part was the patching of damaged DNA sequences and splicing together of the entire genome.
Then came the fun part: We don’t know much about what genes do what, but we do know some things and from those we can extrapolate other things. For example…
This description hardly qualifies for ‘making the man come alive,’ but it’s a start (in a literary sense). Professor Willerslev is developing a good reputation for paleological ‘firsts’ in genetics, as last year he successfully reconstructed the genome of a wooly mammoth. This is, of course, NOT Jurassic Park. This is the painstaking reconstruction of DNA, its analysis, and depending on the state-of-knowledge, a bit of a sleuthing exercise to ascribe characteristics (phenotype) to the person. Incomplete as it may be, this is a big step in providing other researchers a literal map from which to build new knowledge about the peoples from the past.