DNA redundancy: Genetic sequence copies are more prevalent and important than thought

Did you know that our DNA has many copies of some gene sequences, and that it is important? Not long ago and perhaps even now, neither did many genetic scientists. It’s been known in a general way that there is a lot of redundancy in the human genome. It’s even been called ‘a repetitive landscape.’ Some biologists considered the repetition either superfluous or sort of a ‘backup supply’ of DNA. Some of the repetition could be ‘extra DNA’, but new research is indicating that (one) there are many more sequence copies than suspected and (two) they have a variety of roles, some of them very significant.

Part of the problem for scientists was the difficulty in locating and counting duplicated copies of DNA sequences. In fact, the more a sequence is duplicated, the harder it is to distinguish all the copies. While analytical machinery for the human genome has vastly improved in little more than two decades, the problem of multicopy genes persisted. There are roughly 3 billion DNA base pairs (the bonded nucleotides containing the bases adenine, guanine, thymine, and cytosine). Searching for repeated sequences in this haystack isn’t like looking for a needle. It’s like looking through the haystack for straws which are the same but slightly different from other straws.

As part of the massive 1000 Genomes Project researchers at the University of Washington (Seattle, USA) teamed with Agilent Technologies (genome assay equipment) to develop a battery of new genome sequencing and computational techniques that greatly increase the ability to isolate and identify duplicate genetic sequences. The results have been eye-opening.

Reported in Science magazine, October 29, 2010 [Diversity of Human Copy Number Variation and Multicopy Genes] it appears that most of our genes come with two copies standard. About 7 to 9 percent of human genes have several or no copies (copy number variations). Of these, roughly 80 percent have between 0 and 5 copies. However, this study identified 56 gene families that have an ‘extreme’ number of copies ranging from 5 to 368.

“These genes were dramatically enriched for segmental duplication,” the researchers noted. Segmental duplications are regions that were originally identified in the Human Genome Project as long, repeated blocks of the genome.

The researchers report discovering about 44 “hidden” members of duplicated gene families never before identified in the reference model of the human genome.

While duplications of segments of the genome appear to have led to many of the qualities that distinguish human beings from other primate species, areas of the genome in which duplications promote recurrent rearrangements have also been associated with debilitating diseases like intellectual disability, schizophrenia and autism.

[Source: EurekAlert]

These are sweeping associations – “…distinguish human beings from other primate species…”, “…associated with debilitating diseases….” This is actually like saying, “Look, we found more copy number variations than previously thought. Some of them are from gene families associated with both important positive and negative genetic effects. We think this is significant…very significant, but there’s still a lot of work to be done.”

They could have added, “We have little or no idea how these associations work out at the molecular level.” However, the researchers did say there are 28 large regions of the human genome that are so extraordinarily complex that they can’t interpret them. That is, they are areas containing copy sequences so intricate, they are beyond the sensitivity of current equipment and techniques.

The study of DNA and genetics is beginning to resemble particle physics. Scientists continually find new layers of organization and ever more detailed relationships. However, particle physicists can’t lay claim to be working on a cure for cancer.

Research Spectrum

Share
This entry was posted in News and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Posts in this Impact Area: (DNA Decoding)

  • Gene expression and regulation: It’s the location, baby.
  • Fetal DNA sequencing: Reading ma and pa’s genome
  • Bonobo Genome: Our ever-lovin’ kin get closer
  • microDNA: A new piece of genetics puzzle
  • Personal genome disease risk analysis: New study finds important limits
  • Human genetics: The mysterious unequal mutation by sex
  • Oh Daphnia, why so many genes?
  • Hoogsteen base pairs: An alternate structure in DNA
  • The shape of the genome influences genetics
  • DNA redundancy: Genetic sequence copies are more prevalent and important than thought
  • Histones: DNA packaging and much more
  • A form of muscular dystrophy depends on ‘junk’ DNA
  • Transposons and the dynamic genome
  • microRNA: A cellular communicator
  • Update: Research on ‘old-age genes’ challenged
  • The Human Genome Project: Ten years later
  • Fascinating: Many of us have genes from Neanderthals
  • The growing GWAS controversy
  • Genetic pause control
  • A new layer of genetic information: DNA sub-code
  • The pitfalls of ‘informed consent’ for DNA analysis
  • Surprise verdict in U.S. gene patent case
  • Fingered by hand bacteria
  • Clinical genetics: Two cases
  • New study: Metagenomics gets a gut feel
  • Small RNA: New pathways for gene regulation?
  • Follow-up: Another ‘junk DNA’ study
  • More ‘junk DNA’ that actually does something
  • Waking the dead
  • New study and research tool: DNA mutations and molecular effects
  • Common diseases: Rare gene mutations are important
  • Update: Males not at the end of genetic line
  • New study: Males not at the end of genetic line
  • Heart disease linked to epigenetics
  • In the helix grooves – how proteins find the DNA
  • Biological clocks: RNA keeps time
  • Corn (maize) genome sequenced
  • Important bacteria protein-DNA link discovered
  • DNA Barcoding and the supermarket of genetic identification
  • Evolution seen through 10K vertebrate genomes
  • Beyond the genome: Mapping the epigenome
  • Mapping human genome variations
  • One Comment

    1. Posted June 3, 2013 at 9:50 am | Permalink

      Heya excellent blog! Does running a blog similar to this require a great deal of work?
      I’ve very little knowledge of coding but I had been hoping to start my own blog in the near future. Anyways, should you have any suggestions or tips for new blog owners please share. I know this is off subject but I just wanted to ask. Many thanks!

    Post a Comment

    Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

    *
    *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    *