Fetal DNA sequencing: Reading ma and pa’s genome

Depending on how successful interpretation of the personal genome becomes, any method that makes the process easier for collecting the DNA is progress. That’s one way of saying that the future of personal genome medicine depends on the research that finds the links between genes and disease, and how easy and inexpensive it is to get a personal genome reading. One obvious trend is that the equipment for DNA sequencing continues to become less expensive and more powerful, something like the progression followed by computers over the last decades. Research continually finds links between specific genes and human health problems, although the validity of the interpretations (cause and effect) is in dispute. Now a new collection technique promises to make analysis of fetal DNA easier and less problematic.

The approach, developed by Jacob Kitzman and Matthew Snyder at the University of Washington (Seattle, USA), uses a sample of maternal blood taken at about 18 weeks into a pregnancy and a sample of paternal saliva to do genome sequencing and then run the combined genomes (mother, father, fetus) to make a composite and highly accurate reading of the fetus’ genome.

As presented in the journal Science: Translational Medicine [06 June 2012, paywalled, Noninvasive Whole-Genome Sequencing of a Human Fetus] this new approach avoids the difficulty and potential dangers of extracting a fetal DNA sample from inside the mother’s womb. The non-invasive technique relies on the fact that the mother’s blood contains a certain percentage of fetal DNA, which can be isolated and extracted. Several other research groups are also working with this source of fetal DNA, but the Kitzman/Snyder approach also uses the mother’s and father’s genomes to increase the accuracy of assessing the baby’s genome. The claim is 98% percent accuracy.

One of the difficulties in assessing the fetal genome is that in addition to inheriting genes from the mother and father, there are almost certain to be a small number of mutations unique to the fetus. Since these mutations account for a high percentage of genetic disorders, their detection is crucial. It is also, naturally, the hardest part of obtaining accuracy in a genetic sequence of a fetus. Kitzman and Snyder have developed complex software routines, some of them based on statistics and economics, to analyze the sequences looking for mutations. At the moment they are able to discover about 39 out of 44 de novo (not found in the mother or father) mutations. Not bad, but neither scientist considers it good enough.

This difficult identifying and interpreting genetic information, which includes ‘normal’ genes as well as mutations, remains the most formidable barrier for the eventual acceptance of using the personal genome for genetic and medical analysis.

Research Spectrum

Share
This entry was posted in News and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Posts in this Impact Area: (DNA Decoding)

  • Gene expression and regulation: It’s the location, baby.
  • Fetal DNA sequencing: Reading ma and pa’s genome
  • Bonobo Genome: Our ever-lovin’ kin get closer
  • microDNA: A new piece of genetics puzzle
  • Personal genome disease risk analysis: New study finds important limits
  • Human genetics: The mysterious unequal mutation by sex
  • Oh Daphnia, why so many genes?
  • Hoogsteen base pairs: An alternate structure in DNA
  • The shape of the genome influences genetics
  • DNA redundancy: Genetic sequence copies are more prevalent and important than thought
  • Histones: DNA packaging and much more
  • A form of muscular dystrophy depends on ‘junk’ DNA
  • Transposons and the dynamic genome
  • microRNA: A cellular communicator
  • Update: Research on ‘old-age genes’ challenged
  • The Human Genome Project: Ten years later
  • Fascinating: Many of us have genes from Neanderthals
  • The growing GWAS controversy
  • Genetic pause control
  • A new layer of genetic information: DNA sub-code
  • The pitfalls of ‘informed consent’ for DNA analysis
  • Surprise verdict in U.S. gene patent case
  • Fingered by hand bacteria
  • Clinical genetics: Two cases
  • New study: Metagenomics gets a gut feel
  • Small RNA: New pathways for gene regulation?
  • Follow-up: Another ‘junk DNA’ study
  • More ‘junk DNA’ that actually does something
  • Waking the dead
  • New study and research tool: DNA mutations and molecular effects
  • Common diseases: Rare gene mutations are important
  • Update: Males not at the end of genetic line
  • New study: Males not at the end of genetic line
  • Heart disease linked to epigenetics
  • In the helix grooves – how proteins find the DNA
  • Biological clocks: RNA keeps time
  • Corn (maize) genome sequenced
  • Important bacteria protein-DNA link discovered
  • DNA Barcoding and the supermarket of genetic identification
  • Evolution seen through 10K vertebrate genomes
  • Beyond the genome: Mapping the epigenome
  • Mapping human genome variations
  • Post a Comment

    Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

    *
    *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    *