As you get old, you start to forget things. True. Not that you couldn’t forget things when you’re younger and distracted; but as you get older, perhaps you’re more easily distracted. Why would that be? There are many lines of research into the loss of memory capacity as we age. One such line is conducted by Amy Arnsten and a team of researchers at Yale University (New Haven, Connecticut, USA). Their work concentrated on the so-called ‘short term memory’ capacity of the pre-frontal cortex, that region of the brain most associated with moment-to-moment (real time) higher level mental activity. Using a variety of animals at various ages (young, middle aged, and elderly), they tested for firing rates in the pre-frontal cortex while the animals underwent working memory tasks. The results, reported in the journal Nature [27 July 2011, paywalled, Neuronal basis of age-related working memory decline] showed that as the animals age, the rate of neuron firing declines – which implies a loss of memory capacity. More
Daily Popular
- Hoogsteen base pairs: An alternate structure in DNA
- Histones: DNA packaging and much more
- Back to the Future: Cars with hub motors
- Fukushima Meltdown
- Prions: Not alive but they can evolve
- Loricifera: Larger life without oxygen
- Rethink the brain: More evidence for the tripartite synapse
- Oil production from living bacteria
- Government Internet censorship on the rise
- Enhancer RNA (eRNA): More powerful than previously thought
Popular Posts
- .





The Big Splat: New two moon hypothesis
It doesn’t sound very scientific, but some scientists are calling it the “Big Splat.” That refers to the results of a new computer model showing the early Earth having two moons that collided. Planetary scientists Martin Jutzi and Erik Asphaug at the University of Southern California, Santa Cruz (USA) and publishing in the journal Nature [4 August 2011, Early Earth may have had two moons] have constructed a classic example of a testable scientific hypothesis that fits the known facts.
It’s been known for decades that there are striking differences between the surface of the Moon on the near side (the side we see from Earth), which is relatively smooth, low and flat, and the far side, which is high, mountainous and has a much thicker crust, about 50 kilometers (30 miles) thicker. It’s also widely accepted that something about the size of Mars slammed into the Earth about 4.5 billion years ago and ejected material that eventually coalesced into the Moon. The new hypothesis, as simulated by computer, proposes that two moons were created at about that time with the second roughly 1/30th (about 4%) the mass of the larger moon. The second moon shared the same orbit for about 100 million years but at some point it collided – not with a huge high velocity bang, but more likely a slower velocity “splat.” More »