<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SciTechStory &#187; chemotherapy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scitechstory.com/tag/chemotherapy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scitechstory.com</link>
	<description>Tracking the impact of science and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:18:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>First ‘cancer vaccine’ approved in U.S.</title>
		<link>http://scitechstory.com/2010/05/01/first-%e2%80%98cancer-vaccine%e2%80%99-approved-in-u-s/</link>
		<comments>http://scitechstory.com/2010/05/01/first-%e2%80%98cancer-vaccine%e2%80%99-approved-in-u-s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 06:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nelson King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dendreon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prostate cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Provenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scitechstory.com/?p=1331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a way, it is something of a milestone along the road to treating one of mankind’s worst diseases – cancer. The formal approval of an anti-cancer ‘vaccine’ (I’ll explain the quotation marks shortly) is a first for the United States, and as such is a signal to the rest of the world that treatment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a way, it is something of a milestone along the road to treating one of mankind’s worst diseases – cancer. The formal approval of an anti-cancer ‘vaccine’ (I’ll explain the quotation marks shortly) is a first for the United States, and as such is a signal to the rest of the world that treatment for cancer may be entering a new phase. The word vaccine in this instance doesn’t have the usual connotation of being preventative…such as vaccine against polio, smallpox, and the like. In this case, Provenge, a commercial product developed by Dendreon Corporation (Seattle, Washington USA), is a drug that uses the body’s immune system to fight an existing form of advanced prostate cancer. <span id="more-1331"></span></p>
<p>Obviously there are many treatments for cancer, including other treatments for prostate cancer. Provenge is classified as a vaccine because of its use of immunotherapy – its ability to stimulate the immune system to higher levels of antibodies (white blood cells containing proteins that attack this specific form of cancer). The process of creating the vaccine begins with extracting white blood cells from a patient’s own blood. The cells are then treated with protein promoters that are associated with prostate cancer, which ‘tunes’ the white cells against it. Then the white cells are infused back into the patient over a three month period. </p>
<p>The good news, and the reasons for its approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), is that it works and does not have very severe side-effects. </p>
<p>The less good news is that it adds at best about 4 months to the life of a patient with advanced prostate cancer. Also, a typical course of treatment costs about $93,000. </p>
<p>Despite that it’s a marginal improvement over existing drugs, adds a marginal improvement in life-expectancy, and costs a lot of money – it’s a first. That means, once the door has been opened – and believe me, passing through the FDA door is no mean feat – there will be many improvements to follow. As one of its proponents put it: </p>
<blockquote style="background-color:#EAF4FF;"><p>
“The important thing about Provenge is it represents a foundation we can build on,” said Dr. Christopher Logothetis, chairman of M.D. Anderson’s department of genitourinary oncology, who testified to the FDA last year in support of Provenge. “Because its benefits now are fairly modest, it speaks to the promise of the future more than the reality of the moment.”</p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/health/6983801.html">Houston Chronicle</a>]
</p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://www.scitechstory.com/images/sts-sciApplication.gif" alt="Research Spectrum" /></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fscitechstory.com%2F2010%2F05%2F01%2Ffirst-%25e2%2580%2598cancer-vaccine%25e2%2580%2599-approved-in-u-s%2F&amp;title=First%20%E2%80%98cancer%20vaccine%E2%80%99%20approved%20in%20U.S." id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://scitechstory.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scitechstory.com/2010/05/01/first-%e2%80%98cancer-vaccine%e2%80%99-approved-in-u-s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two new cancer-killing nanoparticles</title>
		<link>http://scitechstory.com/2010/02/07/two-new-cancer-killing-nanoparticles/</link>
		<comments>http://scitechstory.com/2010/02/07/two-new-cancer-killing-nanoparticles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nelson King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanobubbles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanomedicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scitechstory.com/?p=985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To use an overworked phrase, it’s a paradigm shift: Cancer research is learning how to ‘think small’ with the potential of nanotechnology – nanoparticles specifically. It’s a shift because medical science has been accustomed to cancer-fighting techniques on the level of bringing cannons to kill a fly. Where doctors once treated cancer with a body-wide [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To use an overworked phrase, it’s a paradigm shift: Cancer research is learning how to ‘think small’ with the potential of nanotechnology – nanoparticles specifically. It’s a shift because medical science has been accustomed to cancer-fighting techniques on the level of bringing cannons to kill a fly. Where doctors once treated cancer with a body-wide dose of chemotherapy, or maybe a targeted dose that still made a mess of the liver; nanotechnology makes it possible to think of killing individual cancer cells, or about sending in a squad of chemo-laden nanoparticles that can deliver a punch to specific kinds of cancer cells in places no other chemistry (or radiation, or scalpel) can reach. For example, here are two recently announced advancements in nanomedicine… <span id="more-985"></span></p>
<p>The first announcement sort of fits the battle metaphor. It’s characterized as ‘zapping nanobubbles.’ …Researchers at Rice University (Houston, USA) have developed a technique for treating cancer cells – one at a time if appropriate – by using gold nanoparticles. The nanoparticles are targeted for a specific type of cancer, where they attach to individual cells. Then a laser device, set to a specific frequency, causes the gold nanoparticles to heat causing either a (nano)bubble inside the cancer cell or exploding it (zapping). </p>
<blockquote style="background-color: #F4EAEA;"><p>
&#8220;Single-cell targeting is one of the most touted advantages of nanomedicine, and our approach delivers on that promise with a localized effect inside an individual cell,&#8221; said Rice physicist Dmitri Lapotko, the lead researcher on the project. &#8220;The idea is to spot and treat unhealthy cells early, before a disease progresses to the point of making people extremely ill.&#8221;</p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-02/ru-rpk020410.php">EurekAlert</a>]
</p></blockquote>
<p>The technique is not only good for an onco-shooting gallery. It can also be used for diagnosis because the nanobubbles are highly visible to microscopes. The researchers refer to this as a ‘theranostic’ opportunity – combining diagnostics followed immediately by therapy. The technique has been tested on human cancer cells. The next steps are trials of various methods of application.</p>
<p>The second announcement is less dramatic. It involves using nanoparticles to cross mucus barriers. That’s less dramatic, but it’s an important achievement. The human body has many organs with natural mucus barriers – the stomach, intestines, lungs, eyes, throat, cervix – some of which are nearly impermeable to traditional drug chemistry. The nanoparticles developed by the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine (Maryland, USA) have a special outer layer of polyethylene glycol (commercially, Carbowax), which makes it possible for the particles to penetrate mucus membranes with ease. The nanoparticles have been created with an inner layer of polysebacic acid, which can hold a variety of drug or genetic molecules, making the particles a drug delivery system that can be targeted for specific diseases. Better yet, the nanoparticles are designed to release their drug cargo as they biodegrade. In effect, the dissolving of the particles is the timer for release of the drugs, and when that’s over, the nanoparticle compounds are flushed out with normal bodily systems. </p>
<p>The original target for these nanoparticles is cystic fibrosis, which is notorious for creating unusually thick and sticky mucus in the lungs and gut.   </p>
<blockquote style="background-color: #F4EAEA;"><p>
The team&#8217;s work was reported recently in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Hanes&#8217; collaborators included cystic fibrosis expert Pamela Zeitlin, a professor of pediatrics at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and director of pediatric pulmonary medicine at the Johns Hopkins Children&#8217;s Center.</p>
<p>&#8220;Cystic fibrosis mucus is notoriously thick and sticky and represents a huge barrier to aerosolized drug delivery,&#8221; she said. &#8220;In our study, the nanoparticles were engineered to travel through cystic fibrosis mucus at a much greater velocity than ever before, thereby improving drug delivery. This work is critically important to moving forward with the next generation of small molecule and gene-based therapies.&#8221;</p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://nanotechnologytoday.blogspot.com/2010/02/biodegradable-particles-can-bypass.html">Nanotechnology Today</a>]
</p></blockquote>
<p>This use of nanoparticles has many potential applications, some of which are in development. </p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fscitechstory.com%2F2010%2F02%2F07%2Ftwo-new-cancer-killing-nanoparticles%2F&amp;title=Two%20new%20cancer-killing%20nanoparticles" id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://scitechstory.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scitechstory.com/2010/02/07/two-new-cancer-killing-nanoparticles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

